Catapultam Habeo

meravie:

I can’t think of any policies in Britain that are created solely to “control” or “humble” women.

The idea that it’s ok to “shame” someone’s body is called free speech, and it’d be hugely detrimental to freedom if we were to sacrifice this. The idea, however, that it is “ok” to “hurt” and “rape” women’s bodies is non-existent because there are laws against these things.

“Harmful gendered politics disguised as protection”? Perhaps you’re referring to women having ludicrous powers in the divorce courts to take disproportionate amounts of money from men and prevent them from seeing their own children?

Considering the world is constantly growing and changing; there is art everywhere and limitless opportunities to view and create art; revolutions have recently taken place in the arab spring (currently looking as if they might have done more harm than good though), it’s clear that the worldview has a place for all these things.

Basically, as “revolutionary” as this little “riotmag” message may look from a distance, when examining it moe closely we can see it is yet another pile of hyperbolic bullshit.

It’s always so nice when I don’t need to add anything.  :)